Pamphlet on what good/bad government is:

By Gman4326

Good government: Honor contracts/just weight and measures

Bad government: Dishonor contracts/just weight and measures Amos 8:4-6

Good government: Does not usurps church authority

1.       Language

2.       How to worship

3.       What sermons is preached

4.       Tax the property

5.       What holidays are celebrated/liturgical calendar

6.       Who is hired are not by the church government

Bad government: Does usurps church authority as listed Amos 5:21; Isaiah 1:14
Good government: Supports liberty and honors self-government
Bad government: Does not support liberty and dishonor self-government
Good government: Does not support people who are in need
Bad government: Does support people who are in need
Good government: Does not tax above 1% Deuteronomy 17:17; Amos 5:11-12
Bad government: Taxes above 1% Genesis 41:34, 1 Samuel 8:14-17
Good government: Does not have a standing army Deuteronomy 17:16
Bad Government: Has a standing army 1 Samuel 8:11-12

Earned Income in the USA (unless you own your own property and a car paid-off already)

By Gman4326

Slave earnings $0-10,999 per year
Poverty $11,000-99,999 per year
Lower middle class $100,000-499,999 per year
Middle class $500,000-$20,999,999 per year
Millionaire status $21,000,000-119,999,999 per year
Wealthy status $120,000,000-4,999,999,999 per year
Billionaire status $5,000,000,000-21,000,000 per year
Anything money earned above this you can own countries and pay-off civil officials

Two views on education

By Gman4326

Christian view on education leads to self-governance; and the other false view leads to salvation (sic).

In many Asian countries the first view is adopted but for the sake of the community.

If you want to read more there are an article on this blog site.

Articles:

Children are both a gift and blessing from God 4/10/15

Is the Triune God allowing the dumbing down of America’s children? 5/12/14

Cliche a story forward

By Gman4326

Is a cliché evil by nature? The answer is no. It advances stories forward sometimes. For an example a man is on the ground and holds out his hand to a relative or friend and says I'm getting to old for this. How so? The exposition by the character is to prevent a pregnant pause from occurring. Yet this cliché is still sin for the script writer had nothing else in his arsenal.

CLICHE = SIN

 

The preaching of the Gospel.

Article 3: (Canon of Dort)



"In order that people may be brought to faith. God mercifully sent evangelists to promulagate this most joyful message to the people he wishes and at a time he wishes. By this ministry people are called to repentance and faoth in the Christ crucified. For how shall they believe in him of who they have not heard? And how will they hear without preaching? And how will they preach unless they have been sent? (Romans 10:14-15)" John Thomas Creeds and Confessions of the Reformed Faith

Qualification of being a wizard:

By Gman4326 

1.       White: theologian and an elder of the church.

2.       Red: missionary, apologist  

3.       Brown: pastor and an elder of the church

4.       Green: father of children, deacon, elder of a church

A green robed wizard doesn't have to be an elder or deacon to join the profession.

This topic is in regards to Christian fantasy.

By Gman4326

Leviticus 20:27

A man also or woman that hath a familiar spirit, or that is a wizard, shall surely be put to death: they shall stone them with stones: their blood shall be upon them. (King James Version)

The general practice of fortune telling and engaging in trying to know the prescriptive will of God is forbidden (in the real world).

(In the fantasy world where wizarding is a profession is an honorable one.)

What if a wizard instead says this: Ye shall therefore keep all of God statutes. He is not calling on what is forbidden but on being a holy person before God and the Father, Son and Holy Spirit.

updated 5/16/2015

Wizards in this fantasy world are ministers of the gospel. These devout men are speaking out against what is evil in God sight. Battling of brown robed wizard against black robed wizard is like engaging in a debate or proclaiming the gospel against the enemy’s natural philosophical world view.

Original

Wizards in Christian worldview are ministers of the gospel. These devout men are speaking out against what is evil in God sight. Battling of brown robed wizard against black robed wizard is like engaging in a debate or proclaiming the gospel against the enemy’s natural philosophical world view.

But God forbids this does him not? In the actual practice what is forbidden the answer is yes.

This a dumb argument you’re making then is it not? If I was calling for the actual practice the answer would be yes.
Is the promulgation of the gospel a sin then? Would your answer be a no also? Any church takes the time to purchase bible tracts will want them handed out.

Entertainment is meant to not only edify the believer but also to educate those who are not. Only if the work is so well done that the unbeliever does not know they are also being indoctrinated as well.  

Have you seen a fortune teller?
Unfortunately the answer would be yes. L

Prose alone does not save

By Mel Scriptorium

In era when American Culture is declining. People need to understand how the tyrant rose to power. The political elite did not rise to power without a little help.

Unlike traditional poetry that relied on figurative language. With regular lines of meter and wordplay. Modernist poetry tries to bring in a larger international/national audience. It thrives on language being private and neutral.

Many scholars connect modern dark gothic prose to Mary Shelley, Lewis Carroll, Bram Stoker and many others. Mary Shelley was raised to believe in the noble savage.

A member of the anti-Christian romantic movement. Along with Lord Byron, John William Polidori and Mary Shelley husband Percy Bysshe Shelley.

Noble Savage assumed their was a group of humans who were not corrupted by 19th century civilization. Jean Jacque Rosseau a Genevan political philosopher of the Enlightenment movement was an Anthropos ideology following the Renaissance.

Like its predecessor the supporters believed that middle ages was evil. Roman-Greco period was the golden age for humanity.

This foolish optimism that humanity can break its shackles. Will always lead to pessimism. Holy Spirit thru Paul told the Athenians

that God overlooked such ignorance. Many Europeans wanted to restart Natural Philosophy but failed every single time.

French Enlightenment also known as the Revolution. It implemented the metric system. Declaration of the Rights of Man in 1791. Which declared that the State is God.

Mister Williams and friends gathered outside of Geneva. To share each others new muse. Out of this Mary created the Frankenstein a savage who is despised by modern man. 

John Polidori was also encouraged to create the Vampire character. Over the last 5000 years men from Jubal to Cultural Marxists want to deny the origin of human thought. But can not deny without becoming shallow in their thinking. 

Storylines in the simplest of terms

By Russell Le Masters

Old man [olde] [mann] adj. neutral: a man who needs help after losing a loved one.

Nobleman's choice [noh-ble] [mann-s] [choy-ce] adj. neutral: King who gives a list to his nobleman so he can hire his own servants.

Boy who cried wolf [boie] [who] [cry-ed] [wool-f] adj. neutral: A boy who is given a task. Instead chooses to be disobedient and pays for it.

Is the Film Industry worth saving in the USA

By Mel Scriptorium

What occurs in any art based system is this; you have the client and the artist. The client is not going to hire a person whose worldview runs opposite to their own. If the best painter in the world is a reformer a catholic will not hire him. Why should he the painter could produce an inferior product and get away with it. Would the painter risk losing clients or even his street cred? This would only make sense if the painter did that to a fellow reformer. What of the audience? The artist is not being paid by them so why would he care. Even if that is the intention of the client the artist is not concerned about it whatsoever.

Hollywood as an institution is not worth saving. How come? The industry has been a place where secular progressive reside sense 1900 see the article a colleague wrote on the history of Hollywood for more details. For an example Mr. Cameron along with Mr. Doane came out with a movie titled "Saving Christmas". Thankfully the atheists hated that film and what I have seen of the promos it was not meant for them. The idea of filming, editing and releasing of a film is not limited to the studios or it would have not been made. Just because the institution is not worth saving does not mean the concept is not. Christians this world belongs to you and the very fact this work was hated is good sign how out of touch the industry is with the audience that wish's to see and watch family friendly programing that reintroduces symbolism a nearly dead concept because of the Public School system.

Can the institution be saved? If there is a 100 year plan in the works absolutely. In the mean time don't be like Beza who advocated during Queen Elizabeth Tudor reign for puritans to stay within a system that murdered many Calvinists under Bloody Mary reign. The studios only care about there client the US government see wikileaks article on Sony making films to please the executive branch or the bailout of MSNBC. Give your money to people who are on your side and not the industry that prefers to sell you pabulum.       

All faiths do not go to the same church.

By Gman4326

Those who live according to the flesh have their minds set on what the flesh desires; but those who live in accordance with the Spirit have their minds set on what the Spirit desires. Apostle Paul (Romans 8:5 NIV)

Sin makes us like drunks who are constantly inebriated.

Son of the dragon loves to control his fellow brothers who are also under Adam’s curse. How come? Often out of personal choices made over a lifetime a man spiritual walk is irreparably harmed. From the sinner’s perspective no harm has been done. I chose this lifestyle says a person who is part of the LGBT Christian minority report. Except they would say I was born this way would be there retort. Many progressives would say different strokes for different folks except when it comes to language. You can have your freedom of conscience except prostrate yourself in front the gray dragon’s statue inside the federal style house where Washington never slept. My Athenian style education where Zeus reigns got me this far doesn’t bother me I have a family to feed. Except his cousin from mordor said the exact same thing and we call that tyranny. So which is it Zeus is right and his cousin is wrong or reverse is true. Can there be a third choice a neutral one where I can dip my toe in both camps? Well no because no dragon wants that.

There is only one correct worldview. Autonomous person wants to change a society for salvific purposes. The salvific person sees men committing acts of crime and wants a better society without acknowledging man is born cursed and it is the work of the Holy Spirit to regenerate them. To get a complete view of history or any other topics.

Christianity must dominate every aspect of life. The first four books found in the New Testament is the only time that complete view of person life is found. Matthew view is Israel rejecting the Messiah, Mark is writing to the Romans, Luke to the gentile believer and John that Christ Jesus is God. Each inspired by the Holy Spirit to be read four different ways but the same message Jesus is the only begotten son of God. Did they not have motives in writing to fellow first century believers and the answer is yes. Is this a crime to modern skeptics and scoffers the answer is in the positive! Therefore look up Horace Mann bio online along with Political Polytheism by Dr. Gary North which can be found online at his free books website.